<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Projects | AKitsche Blog</title><link>https://akitsche.netlify.app/project/</link><atom:link href="https://akitsche.netlify.app/project/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Projects</description><generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© 2021 Andreas Kitsche</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Power and sample size computations for the simultaneous assessment of the consistency of treatment effects</title><link>https://akitsche.netlify.app/project/power_consistency/</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://akitsche.netlify.app/project/power_consistency/</guid><description>&lt;p>In this study power and sample size calculations for the analysis of treatment-by-subgroup interactions are proposed. Therefore, the interaction effect is either defined via product-type interaction contrasts or as ratio of treatment differences. The latter formulation allows besides the detection of interactions also the assessment of the consistency/heterogeneity of the subgroup-specific treatment effect by the definition of an inconsistency margin.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>You can find the pdf of a detailed article &lt;a href="pdf/PowerConsistency_SIM.pdf">here&lt;/a>. Furthermore, the slides from a corresponding talk are given &lt;a href="JournalClub_Power.pdf">here&lt;/a>.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Alternative effect size measurements corresponding to the two sample t-test</title><link>https://akitsche.netlify.app/project/effect_size/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://akitsche.netlify.app/project/effect_size/</guid><description>&lt;p>If interest is in comparing the means of two (normally distributed) samples it is common practise to perform a two-sample t-test and report the corresponding p-value. Nevertheless, it has been widely criticized that the p-value does not provide a measure for the magnitude of the mean effect (e.g., Browne (2010)). This report provides an overview of existing alternatives recently published in the scientific literature that provide a more meaningful measurement of the effect size. Browne (2010) introduced closed form equations to translate a significant t-test p-value and sample size into the probability of one treatment being more successful than another on a per individual basis. This term was afterwards denoted as win probability by Hayter (2013) and he demonstrated the interpretation as &amp;ldquo;what would happen if a single future observation were to be taken from either of the two treatments, with attention being directed towards which treatment would win by providing the better value.&amp;rdquo; In addition Hayter (2013) introduced the corresponding confidence interval as well as the odds of X being greater than Y. He further introduced the transformation into Cohens effect size and the corresponding confidence intervals.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>You can find the pdf of a detailed article &lt;a href="https://akitsche.netlify.app/files/pdf/effect_size.pdf">here&lt;/a>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>